Employee Engagement helps to Organizational Performance
Why
should companies invest in employee engagement?
The answer is because employee engagement is connecting significantly
with important business outcomes.
How
employee engagement impacts organizational performance in the light of various
research works done. Studies have found
positive relationship between
employee engagement and
organizational performance outcomes:
employee retention, productivity, profitability, customer loyalty and
safety. The local example of all
leading organization such as Singer Sri
Lanka, Commercial Bank, Dialog, Mobitel,
indicate that
the more engaged
employees are, the
more likely their
employer is to
exceed the industry
average in its revenue growth.
Employee engagement is
found to be
higher in double-digit
growth companies. Employee engagement indicates that engagement is positively
related to customer satisfaction (Coffman, 2000; Ellis and Sorensen, 2007; Towers Perrin
Talent Report, 2003;
Hewitt Associates, 2004;
Heintzman and Marson, 2005;
Coffman and Gonzalez-Molina, 2002). Engaged employee consistently
demonstrates three general
behaviors which improve
organizational performance:
1. Say-the employee advocates for the organization to co-workers, and refers potential employees and customers
2. Stay-the employee has an intense desire to be a member of the organization despite opportunities to work elsewhere
3. Strive-the employee exerts extra time, effort and initiative to contribute to the success of the business ( Baumruk and Gorman, 2006)
What
will happen to an organization if its employees are disengaged? Employees who
are not engaged are likely to be spinning (wasting their effort and talent on
tasks that may not matter much), settling (certainly do not show full
commitment, not dissatisfied enough to make a break) and splitting (they are not
sticking around for things to
change in their
organization), have far
more misgivings about
their organization in
terms of performance
measures such as customer satisfaction (Blessing White, 2006; Perrin
Report, 2003). Meere (2005) based on the survey
conducted by ISR
on 360000 employees
from 41 companies
in the world’s
10 economically strong
countries finds that
both operating margin
and net profit
margins reduced over
a three year
period in companies
with low engagement,
while these measures
increased over the
specified period in
companies with high levels of engagement.
Financial News,
March 2010, as
cited by Accord
Management Systems (2014),
tells that disengaged
employees are more likely to cost their organization. According to the
report, Employees who are disengaged:
- · Miss an average of 3.5 more days per year
- · Are less productive
- · Cost the US economy $292 to $355 billion per year
In
the current business context, all industries having stiff competition among
their respective sectors, hence to keep good employees within the organization is
great task for every organization. So organization needs to practice employee engagement
building programs inside the organization. If the increase the number of
engaged employees in the organization it will benefited to deliver organization
objectives and increase the individual performance as well as organizational
performance.
References
Accord Management Systems. (2014). Employee Engagement Strategy:
A Strategy of Analysis to Move from Employee Satisfaction to Engagement.
Meere M. (2005). High cost of
disengaged employees Victoria: Swinburne University of
Technology. [Online] Available:http://www.swinburne.edu.au/corporate/industrysolutions/ee/reports/Employee%20Engagement%20industry%20Breifing%20Paper%20Dec%202005%20.pdf
(October 30, 2008)
Melcrum publishing. (2005). Employee
engagement: How to build a high-performance workforce. An independent Melcrum Research Report Executive
Summary
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.1591&rep=rep1&type
(accessed 11th December 2017)
LAST REFERENCE WAS WRONG RECORRECT IT ASAP.ALSO YOU ARE ONLY WROTE HERE POSTIVE THINGS OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT,CAN YOU EXTEND IT TO NEGATIVE.
ReplyDeleteA great perspective on a much-discussed topic Malin!!
ReplyDeleteEmployee engagement should start off even before an employee is recruited into the organization. While signing a physical contract in agreement of certain conditions, a psychological contract should also be signed by the employer and employee. If this connection is successfully made, then the employee will be engaged with the organization. However, this engagement should be a two-way connection where both the employer and employee are in an understanding of their individual aspirations and goals, and where the same are aligned. This creates a win-win situation for both parties. Thus, it helps organizational performance as well as individual performance of the employee to be on a positive note.
However as per discussed in the classroom employee engagement may take a negative impact on the work life balance of the employee.
Whilst employee engagement is a critical factor for organizational performance, globally engagement percentage is reducing. As per the latest statistics it only 13% of the employees worldwide is engaged. (Gallup).
ReplyDeleteThus HR teams require to develop strategies towards increasing the engaged levels. These strategies will include ,
1. Conducting proper engagement surveys and act on the outcome
2. Encourage employee suggestions
3. Develop training programs based on individual leaning styles
4. Establishing an effective two way dialog between organization and emloyees
An engaged employee is a person who is fully involved, and enthusiastic about his or her work. As discussed above there are many benefits of employee engagement, such as employee satisfaction, productivity, retention, recruitment, innovation and profitability. And this enthusiasm and engagement of an employee can be boosted up be several factors like motivation, rewards and recognition from the management. The HR of the organization has to guide the employee in a positive and a challenging way in order to get the best outcome from the employees. This can be achieved effectively by conducting motivational programs every month and also by rewarding the employees depending on their quality of work.
ReplyDelete